government:hierarchy_level
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
government:hierarchy_level [2017/12/01 12:36] – admin | government:hierarchy_level [2017/12/01 16:47] (current) – admin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* **Bands**, the simplest level of social organization, | * **Bands**, the simplest level of social organization, | ||
- | * **Tribes** are the lowest level of social organization which allow for diplomatic interaction. Tribes can be complex hunter-gatherers or simple | + | * **Tribes** are the lowest level of social organization which allow for diplomatic interaction. Tribes can be complex hunter-gatherers, pastoralists, |
- | * **Simple Chiefdoms** have developed a centralized, | + | * **Simple Chiefdoms** have developed a centralized, |
- | * **Complex Chiefdoms** have developed a multi-layered hierarchy which can manage one area directly and can have single provinces (under Simple Chiefdoms) as subjects. Complex Chiefdoms | + | * **Complex Chiefdoms** have developed a multi-layered hierarchy which can manage one area directly and can have single provinces (under Simple Chiefdoms) as subjects. Complex Chiefdoms |
- | * **Empires** have a much more developed hierarchy which can manage one region directly and can have areas as subjects. | + | * **Empires** have a much more developed hierarchy which can manage one region directly and can have areas as subjects. Empires are always agrarians, though they may have pastoralist |
- | * **States** have a fully developed bureaucracy which can manage an entire continent directly and can have regions as subjects. | + | * **States** have a fully developed bureaucracy which can manage an entire continent directly and can have regions as subjects. States are always agrarians, though they may have pastoralist |
government/hierarchy_level.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/01 16:47 by admin