User Tools

Site Tools


government:hierarchy_level

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
government:hierarchy_level [2017/12/01 12:36] admingovernment:hierarchy_level [2017/12/01 16:47] (current) admin
Line 2: Line 2:
  
   * **Bands**, the simplest level of social organization, are represented by "empty" provinces. They cannot be directly interacted with (although events may allow for interaction). Bands are always simple hunter-gatherers.   * **Bands**, the simplest level of social organization, are represented by "empty" provinces. They cannot be directly interacted with (although events may allow for interaction). Bands are always simple hunter-gatherers.
-  * **Tribes** are the lowest level of social organization which allow for diplomatic interaction. Tribes can be complex hunter-gatherers or simple agriculturalists. They do not allow for most government actions, as they do not have a centralized, enforced leadership, and they can control at most one province, with no subjects. However, tribes can evolve into Simple Chiefdoms under certain circumstances. +  * **Tribes** are the lowest level of social organization which allow for diplomatic interaction. Tribes can be complex hunter-gatherers, pastoralists, or simple agrarians. They do not allow for most government actions, as they do not have a centralized, enforced leadership, and they can control at most one province, with no subjects. However, tribes can evolve into Simple Chiefdoms under certain circumstances. 
-  * **Simple Chiefdoms** have developed a centralized, enforced leadership, but that leadership's power is limited in range to one province, and they cannot have subjects. Simple Chiefdoms can be complex hunter-gatherers or agriculturalists+  * **Simple Chiefdoms** have developed a centralized, enforced leadership, but that leadership's power is limited in range to one province, and they cannot have subjects. Simple Chiefdoms can be complex hunter-gatherers, pastoralists, or agrarians
-  * **Complex Chiefdoms** have developed a multi-layered hierarchy which can manage one area directly and can have single provinces (under Simple Chiefdoms) as subjects. Complex Chiefdoms and above are always agriculturalists+  * **Complex Chiefdoms** have developed a multi-layered hierarchy which can manage one area directly and can have single provinces (under Simple Chiefdoms) as subjects. Complex Chiefdoms can be either pastoralists or agrarians
-  * **Empires** have a much more developed hierarchy which can manage one region directly and can have areas as subjects. +  * **Empires** have a much more developed hierarchy which can manage one region directly and can have areas as subjects. Empires are always agrarians, though they may have pastoralist subjects. 
-  * **States** have a fully developed bureaucracy which can manage an entire continent directly and can have regions as subjects.+  * **States** have a fully developed bureaucracy which can manage an entire continent directly and can have regions as subjects. States are always agrarians, though they may have pastoralist subjects.
government/hierarchy_level.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/01 16:47 by admin